A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLV GPS 36 approach question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old August 10th 06, 05:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default OLV GPS 36 approach question

John Clonts wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:

John Clonts wrote:


wrote:


It seems to me you are ignoring the depiction of the southern sector on
the map view that shows 2800. This applies to aircraft inbound to
DOCAP from anywhere southern. Why are you saying that it does not
apply? (I.e. why is the controller allowed to clear the a/c to DOCAP
and descend to 2100?).


2,100 applies at DOCAP per the IAP. The MVA is 2,000 to the west of
DOCAP and 2,100 to the east.


Yes but I am talking about *prior to* DOCAP. 2800 applies prior to
DOCAP per the IAP. If ATC clears an a/c to 2100 prior to DOCAP is it
(1) a controller error which should be refused by the pilot, or (2) ok
because somehow "mva trumps iap arrival sector altitude"?


Again, a more consistent handling with the IAP profile and human-factors
would have been for ATC to assign 2,800 to DOCAP.



Under the present wording in the ATC Handbook MVA trumps the
direct-entry sector's altitude.

Another way to look at it is the IAP begins at the IF based on the
clearance.

An anology would be a "true" vector to final, say a 30 degree cut to the
approach course 2 miles inside DOCAP. 2,100 would be an acceptable
controller assignment in that case.

The new application might work better with a restriction to not assign
an altitude below the IF crossing altitude. But, that is not how it
reads at present.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 04:19 AM
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 36 April 16th 04 12:41 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.