![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Greg Copeland wrote: I seriously doubt he was "taking evasive action" until he started he turn to the right. Unlike me, he had a window view of us. The fact that he continued to climb into our path, in class B, with a window view, does not indicate to me he was "evading" anything. The fact that he turned, head on, after climbing, to me, does not indicate he was "evading." Hi Greg, it was not my intent to offend you - just playing "what if" with the information you provided. After your clarification it sounds like this definitely took place in the class B but that was not clear (at least to me) from your initial post. As far as what the other guy was thinking, unfortunately we'll likely never know - but given he was climbing and turning, it still sounds to me like he did see you. Given the guy was apparently operating illegally in class B, there's certainly reason to question his piloting skills, but the fact this happened on class B has no real bearing on the subsequent events. The other guy may have been completely unaware he was there (which is a problem for the FAA to worry about), and VFR traffic advisories are optional regardless. Just to play devil's advocate, consider what the other guy might have been thinking. He sees your plane, knows you have the right of way, and climbs to 4500. He won't be able to see you any better in the climb than you can see him, right? Then he turns to the right only to see you've turned to the left. He waits a little bit to see what you're going to do next, and after he sees you turn to the right he also turns right. After the incident is over, maybe he thought his initial course was underneath the class B shelf, but now that he's diverted to the north and climbed he's inside it, so he turns southbound and descends back to 3500. Did it happen that way? I obviously don't know, but it sounds possible. It's also possible the other guy was being a complete idiot, but there's no way to know for sure. I don't think you did anything wrong, but maybe the other guy didn't do anything wrong either, aside from violating airspace. Unfortunately, as others have pointed out, there's no sure-fire method for resolving the conflict even if both parties are aware of it. And, as I said before, really the important part is that the conflict did get resolved and everyone's still around to debate the circumstances. todd. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Third Military-Civil MAC Jan. 18, 2005 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 37 | February 14th 05 03:21 PM |
interesting collision alert device | Steve / Sperry | Soaring | 1 | March 19th 04 10:31 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |