![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you really want to read more about this seemingly impossible
competitive scenario, read this, from our local newspaper: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y1EA1249D I don't understand it. My kids don't understand it. No one I talks to understands it. Yet, it's happened. And a fair number of small motels are in grave danger because of it -- including ours. How is this =really= different from WalMart jumping in and crushing all the local stores? Think for a moment. It's city-owned. This means it's paid for with taxpayer money, and profits go back to the taxpayer (in the form of lower taxes). Every citizen is a shareholder of this business. (Skip for a moment the question of whether they are willing shareholders). Other than the fact that it's owner is a municipality, this is a business just like any other business. It is competition just like any other competition. If you wanted, you could put together fifty million and compete with them. That is capitalism. It may appear that the fact that it's city owned would give it an unfair advantage, inasmuch as the city is also the legislative body entrusted with making laws, and they could make laws favorable to their own business, and put other businesses at an unfair disadvantage. But what is unfair about that? Big (independently owned) businesses do this all the time - it's called lobbying and buying votes. I don't think for a minute that WalMart isn't close and tidy with the municipalities in which it plants itself, getting tax breaks that smaller businesses could only dream of. They can do this because they are big, and the municipaliaites want the added commerce that such a big business will bring (and the added taxes on those other businesses that the added commerce would bring) Yes, it's an illusion, but it's one that taxpayers buy into. I'm sure there is a sense that city-owned is "too close" but lobbying is "okay capitalism" but I don't really see it that way. I see it as simply a matter of size, and what 600 pounds buys a gorilla. Unrestrained capitalism does this. They get the keys to their own cage. Your city owned hotel just does this more blatantly. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
$640.00 to fill the tanks... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 304 | August 29th 06 02:16 PM |
Flt. 800 Anniversay: Exploding Fuel Tanks STILL In Airline Planes!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 3 | July 24th 06 06:06 PM |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |