![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air traffic Controllers have no way of telling the
altitude of an aircraft without SSR or a talkdown radar. Air defenders used height finding radar which is not available at civil units (I don't think it's in use anymore; maybe). Some civil units in the UK have made use of Air Traffic radar at military units, but this is straight forward ATC equipment, the same as at any airport. At 11:06 22 August 2006, Don Johnstone wrote: I think you will find that and ordinary primary radar can give an approximate height when processed. This 'Height' is not accurate enough to provide seperation for controllers but is available. The slant range to the target is used as one measurement and the other is the point on the globe over which the target is. with two sides known of a right angled triangle the third side is calculated by using Pythagorus, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides, the slant range being the hypotenuse. At 03:36 22 August 2006, Mal wrote: 'Don Johnstone' wrote in message ... At 23:00 21 August 2006, Lew Hartswick wrote: Mark Dickson wrote: Unless the glider was transponder equipped, the only radar that could give the height would be a Precision Approach Radar (Talkdown). This only scans 10 degrees either side of the runway centreline and is not widely used at civilian airports. If ATC knew the height I think it would have been via a report from another aircraft. I think you will find that air defence radars are very capable of giving an accurate height and in many cases civilian air traffic radars are taking a feed from the very same radar heads as the military. Plus there is a deal more co-operation between the civilian and military radars in the present climate. The feed that the civilian world gets from the military heads is only cut down in range and tailored to the need of the controller. Many years ago I visited a local airfield radar and they did not have their own radar transmitter. They used a feed from the Air Defence radar situated just down the road. http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/radar-reflector-e.html http://www.cap.gov/visitors/news/cap...ex.cfm?fuseact ion=display&nodeID=6192&newsID=1918&year=2005&m onth=12 Would appear that they can get a primary paint sent an email to airservices and asked the same question I asked in here lets see what they say. Mal |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UK Mode S. Our responce is required | gAiL | Soaring | 24 | August 14th 06 01:10 AM |
gliders+radar | [email protected] | Soaring | 22 | July 22nd 06 11:26 PM |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |
Anti Collision Warning | George Vranek | Soaring | 80 | May 6th 04 08:27 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |