![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Google found several "aviation Koch chart" links including
this one http://wind-drifter.com/technical/technical.htm scroll down the page. They have some calculators listed, but the Koch Chart is just the graph. But any high school math teacher should be able to walk you through the solution of the algebra problem to find the system of equations. "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... | "abripl" wrote in message | ups.com... | Does anybody have the Koch Chart formula (equation)? Or know where to | find it? | | I don't think there is an actual equation that works generally. As an | obvious counter-proof to the idea that there is one, consider that density | altitude affects airplanes with normally aspirated engines differently from | those with turbocharged engines. The same Koch chart would not work for | both types of airplanes. | | I haven't done a lot of research on the origin of the Koch chart, but I | believe that it's to be used as a general guideline, not as a precise | determination of how airplane performance is affected by density altitude. | | If you do want to implement the Koch chart mathematically somehow, I'd | suggest that your best bet (in terms of ease of implementation) would be to | manually read off a range of pressure altitude and temperature combinations | to create tables giving the performance adjustment, and then interpolate | between the values for specific input of pressure altitude and temperature. | | You could more accurately describe a Koch chart mathematically by actually | reverse engineering it (the scales on the middle portion of the chart appear | to be logarithmic and exponential for the takeoff distance and climb rate | reduction, respectively, so you simply need to measure the scales and | determine the base and power for those functions, and the pressure altitude | and temperature graphs appear to be linear), but that may be more trouble | than it's worth. Given that the chart isn't a precise way to determine the | performance change anyway, you may find it's overkill to analyze the chart | that way. | | Pete | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery lines on NY VFR terminal chart | Ron Garret | Piloting | 3 | May 22nd 05 05:07 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
King Videos: Jeppesen Chart Review (2 tapes on eBay) Approaches & Enroute, Departures, & Arrivals | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 11th 03 05:14 PM |