A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Class A airspace



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old August 24th 06, 06:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Soarin Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Class A airspace

1 901.96 Thiele Uwe co pilot Dach Rüdiger US (BW) 1139.6
141.1 Parowan Ut Gld (US) SFV Mannheim Nimbus 3DM 1818-0222
flight file 665c3k51-190 this file when opened in SeeYou
list Peter Klos as pilot.

At 16:36 23 August 2006, Doug Haluza wrote:
I can't find the 6/5/06 flight, much less a registration
for a Peter
Klose from the SFV Mannheim Club, or any OLC fligt
claims from a Peter
Klose. So I don't know if this is a bogus complaint,
or if the pilot
removed all his flights and registration in protest.

Either way, posting this kind of complaint on r.a.s
is not the proper
way to addres this. There is a partner check function
in the OLC which
should be used. US complaints can also be emailed to
olcssaorg. We have access to the pilot's email and
can contact
them if necessary, and/or remove offending flights.

As pointed out, logger pressure altitude errors can
be quite large,
especially at high altitudes. If your calibration trace
shows a large
unfavorable error around 18,000' MSL, it would be best
to add a note
addresing this in the comments field of the claim form.

Doug Haluza
SSA-OLC Admin

Soarin Again wrote:
On 6/5/06 Peter Klose from the SFV Mannheim club
flying a Nimbus 3DM D-KTTT out of Parowan, Utah had
such a large error in his logger that he went to 19,180.

The OLC should pull his flight until he provides
a calibration chart to verify that much error. It
would be bad enough if someday some lawless U.S. pilot
causes us to loose the airspace privledges we currently
enjoy.
I'm sure if a U.S. pilot flying in Germany disregarded
their airspace limitations, he would quickly be excused
from further flight.
For those who would say that maybe he had a clearence.
That should have been included in the remarks section
of the flight claim. I'm sure we have some glider
pilot in that area who would have been able to verify
it with ATC.

2. Are you aware of the size of potential altimeter
errors at high
altitudes? The altimeter used for inflight reference
could easily
have indicated 400' lower than the baro reference
you
see on OLC.

3. Fly your own ship.


Jack





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Carrying flight gear on the airlines Peter MacPherson Piloting 20 November 25th 04 12:29 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.