![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm speaking of the question by the OP, which seemed to be
asking if all you had was the compass or the TC [needle], which would be primary. The compass gives 0 [zero] bank angle indication and in a steep turn may not rotate at all. Controlling the airplane can be done with the TC plus some pitch instrument. Controlling the airplane with ONLY the compass is much more difficult because it indicates reverse turn direction on all headings except near 180 degrees (northern hemisphere). Very few airplanes have the mag compass located where it can be flown as sole reference, most are mounted on the windshield post. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... | | Jim Macklin wrote: | If you're down to just the compass, worry more about keeping | the wings "level" and less about heading. The compass, in | the northern hemisphere will work as the sole instrument | only when flying south [saw between 150-210] heading. It | will be very sensitive and indicate the correct turn | direction. | | I'm not sure I follow. During my CFII training I got a solid 2 hours of | flying partial panel with compass turns. I was able to fly exact | vectors to ILS, etc. If I was off even by 2 degrees when I rolled out | on a heading my CFII would yell at me. I can tell you from experience | you 100% can fly very, very exact headings in any direction using | compass turns if you know how to read the compass and account for the | effects. I'm not saying doing so in IMC would be as easy as it is under | the hood but personally, I would do that in a second before trying to | do the math required of timed turns while under the pressure of partial | panel IMC. Of course most of us have GPSs which are actually a much | better partial panel way to figuring heading (approximated as course). | | -Robert, CFII | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Stupid Question | Crash Lander | Piloting | 35 | July 23rd 06 02:39 AM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |