![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote: I agree, except for "looking." When ATC calls traffic, you have three choices in my experience: Negative contact, traffic in sight (not "contact"), or looking. If ATC calls traffic, responding with "negative contact" before I have a chance to look is counterproductive. Counterproductive to what? No response while I look is also counterproductive, because the controller has no idea whether I heard the traffic call or not. Responding with "looking" acknowledges the transmission and tells the controller than I don't have the traffic but I'm not blowing it off. Why would the controller presume you are "blowing it off?" After I've had a chance to actually scan for the traffic, I will respond with either "negative contact" or "traffic in sight." Then "looking" was an extra, unnecessary transmission. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |