![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote in
: ET wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in : "Viperdoc" wrote: Have to agree that "looking" in response to a traffic call is reasonable. Saying "roger" makes it unclear as to whether you actually have the traffic in sight. Both responses are incorrect. "Traffic in sight (the correct response) makes it very clear that you have the traffic in sight. OK, then what do YOU say to ack. the call, but you have not yet seen the traffic???? If I haven't seen the traffic before the ATC call, I scan for 3-5 seconds. If I can't find the traffic after this time, I reply "ATC, N12345, negative contact on the traffic." Matt Hrrm, well, I'm still a student pilot (2-2000 mile+ cross countries as a pax handling the radio though with FF) but to me that just sounds like "I looked for 3-5 seconds and gave up..." -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |