![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of clarifications, please, for the IFR-challenged...
1. Is there a good reason for the holding point for the GPS approach to 30, to be back 11.8 miles back from the holding point for the LOC approach? They have established UBWAY right at the marker, so why do they not let the GPS approaches use it as the hold point as well, instead of sending them all the way back??? 2. What is the controller's expectation (and/or the SOP) for getting into the LOC approach from a high hold (like 4-5-6 thsnd) over BALES?? My presumption would be that he expects a descent to 2600 still within the racetrack?? Once at 2600 (lets say you get to 2600 on the outbound leg) are you expected to complete the whole racetrack for the last time... or do you just cut it short, cross BALES, and begin the descent??? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS/WAAS VNAV approaches and runway length | Nathan Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | October 25th 04 06:16 PM |
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | February 14th 04 02:51 AM |
What approaches are in a database? | Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | January 4th 04 07:57 PM |
Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 05:10 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |