![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... If your family was on that plane, would you be angry? Damn straight, you would be. I don't know. Maybe I would, maybe I wouldn't. I've experienced what I consider to be tragic loss in the past without feeling anger at anyone. But that's not the question here. Andrew's family wasn't on the plane, and his anger is misplaced, even if it could be understandable (albeit irrational) on the part of people who had relationships with the people who died. Intentional does not have anything to do whether anger is justified. If you are talking about anger directed at the pilots, then of course it does. Anger may be understandable, but justified implies that there is some rational basis for the anger. It may turn out that there is indeed some rational basis for the anger, but for the moment there is absolutely no information that would support that conclusion. These were two professional pilots that made a mistake that is without reason How do you know that the mistake was made without reason? , a kind of mistake not in any way permitted for professional pilot. Are there mistakes that are permitted for professional pilots? What mistakes would those be? If they had survived, I would expect that they would never be allowed to again hold an ATP. Unless there's new news I haven't heard, one did survive. I guess we'll see if he loses his pilot certificate or not. How that's relevant to the question of justified anger, I don't know. Maybe you could explain it. For what ever reason, they did not have the right stuff, that day. The right stuff is absolutely essential, every time, for an ATP to do his thing, and if the mistake were survived this time, you can not know if they would make a critical mistake in the future. We, the "riding public," have a right to expect better than that. I'd agree you have a right to expect to not be killed on an airline flight, or on any flight for that matter. As a society, we tend to value our expectation that we won't be killed. But in what way does that justify anger against at least one person who suffered the same dire consequences that all the passengers did, and who for all we know was doing the very best they were capable of in their situation to perform their duties? I know...I'm just spitting in the wind here. Perhaps on Usenet more than anywhere else, but certainly in society as a whole, people LOVE to judge. They LOVE to make accusations and pretend they know EXACTLY what the score is, long before they really do. Still, that doesn't make it right, and when you and others insist on going around doing so, I'm going to speak up if I'm around to see it. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Fact or satirical fiction? | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | March 28th 06 01:28 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |