![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote: john smith wrote: The pilot leans until roughness, then enriches a couple quarter turns. If he doesn't have an EGT gauge, using roughness or RPM peaking is not a bad system. The aviator calculates density altitude and uses the CHT/EGT to accurately adjust the mixture. Tell me what possible use a calculated density altitude or CHT is for setting the mixture. A EGT with reasonable response time is preferable, other than that using the RPM peaks/roughness is as as good as can be obtained. I can tell you on my plane, that even using my multipoint EGT I get mixture settings not substantially different (save a little better fuel economy) than the "lean to roughness" technique. Consider the fact that many pilots do not even look at the tables in the POH/AOH. Additionally, they have no clue what the manufacturer recommended degrees rich/lean of peak to operate at max power or max range. How much do you adjust the mixture after attaining roughness? A little? A lot? Just enough to smooth it out? That kind of adjustment can kill an engine quickly. Consider the fact that many do not even care! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Fact or satirical fiction? | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | March 28th 06 01:28 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |