![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Euro experience from hang glide list
Bizjet collides with glider in Nevada Posted by: "Bart Doets" bart.doets@ Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:31 am (PST) ----- Original Message ----- From: "xcnick4" xcnick4@ The fear is that gliding will be considered unsafe without Mode S transponders and they will make us all buy these gismos. Great Britain is facing this realty right now. Who is next? Hang gliders? Paragliders? Geese? Dunno how this is going in the USA, but in Europe it has already been decided that HGs and PGs (and ULs etc.) must have mode S transponders. The only thing that has postponed the actual effectuation of the decision is, that there were no transponders on the market that would do the job working on battery power. Seems right now there are transponders in a range from 1350 to 2000 Euros ($1627-2410) that are supposed to work 4-5 hours. (Remember how the first useable GPS's would not work by far as long as they were supposed to?) I am a bit worried about the seemingly waiting mode that the European HG orgs are in. As far as I know only the British org has sort of called up its members, but it might be far too late anyway - the decision is cast years ago. The only thing that really might help us out is the marketing of a mode S transponder at a price of just a couple of hundred euros max, like the first GPS's that really hit big (Garmin 38). A couple of weeks ago, a colleague of mine took me on a flight in a motorglider, from Hilversum airfield in the centre of Holland. Hilversum is close to the edge of Schiphol(Amsterdam airport) CTR. My colleague told me: "This plane is equipped with a transponder, but following a request from Schiphol tower we keep it switched off most of the time. Seems all those tiny bleeps and bloops along the edge of their CTR are unnecessarily complicating their work." I'm really worried that the transponder obligation will effectively kill all but the most expensive non-motorized flying. To a glass glider it may only be a small raise in cost, but for many hanggliders it will be out of proportion. And... would it really help? Bart Doets Holland T o d d P a t t i s t wrote: Eric Greenwell wrote: Todd, I know you may not have intended it that way, but some people do take it that way, and that is one of the reasons/excuses I hear for not installing a transponder. I certainly did not intend it as a discouragement for installation of transponders, but it's a concern I've heard expressed too. I'd like to see the FAA make it legal for the transponder to be turned off in gliders to remove this excuse/concern. I consider anyone who buys a transponder and installs it, but turns it off when needed to save batteries, to be someone who is concerned about improving safety. That's why I called it a "good deed" but having a midair with it off is a scary possibility given the current FARs. -- T o d d P a t t i s t - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Minden Vote - Results | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | November 20th 05 06:01 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Minden In Two Weeks | ADP | Soaring | 3 | August 10th 04 01:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |