![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Perhaps this is a naive question, but: Why don't voice radio communications for aviation use FM radio instead of AM radio? I realize there's substantial inertia in the installed base of AM equipment, but surely one could allocate some new frequencies to FM and use them in parallel for some years to ease the transition. If one were to mandate a replacement technology, it would be far far more effective to use the packet-based mechanisms that digital cellular phone technology and 802.11 wireless Ethernet (aka WiFi) rely on. Both these technologies turn over the job of transmission collision resolution to chip logic and take humans out of the loop. And it is possible to put audio over WiFi using Voice over IP (VoIP) technology. Such a system would be incredibly flexible. If one had, say, ten planes in the air and they all started to talk to ATC at once, a packet-based system would make it possible to do any of the following: 1) Clearly deliver only one of the voice signals to the controller and provide a visual display that indicated 9 other planes had attempted to speak also. It could even provide audio or visual feedback to the other 9 pilots that their transmissions were not delivered - or it could automatically sequence the delivery of the transmissions to the controller if the transmissions were not too lengthy. 2) If multiple controllers were available, the audio from several of the planes could be routed to multiple controllers with no impact on audio fidelity as far as the controllers or pilots are concerned. 3) Once you go packetized audio, you can put all sorts of useful stuff in the packets for presentation to the other end - such as aircraft number, the location and velocity vector from the aircraft's GPS or altimeter/DG/airspeed indicator, and so on. A pilot could key the mike and make a request without needing to ID themselves or their position - that information would be extracted from the audio packet's header and automatically presented on either a simple display to the controller or mapped to a fancy map display. The technical issues have been pretty much solved and commoditized in both the WiFi VoIP and digital cellular realms. It is my humble opinion that the radio technology currently being used for aviation communications is now less reliable and useful than even that used in home WiFi networks. Maybe someday the FAA and/or ICAO will consider replacing analog radios with a more capable digital system.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |