![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 13:39:09 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: Larry Dighera writes: --- cut----- Anything that isn't signal is noise. AM transmissions are fuzzy and hard to hear. In fact, aviation AM radio is probably the noisiest type of radio voice communication still in use. Most other types of radio communication today are FM. This thread is becoming a lot of guessing and not based on facts! I doubt anybody has evaluated AM compared to FM in an aircraft so won't know what the effects are when tried side by side. There is absolutely no difference in qualilty between AM & FM if they are designed to the same specification. If you modulate an AM or FM transmitter with up to 3KHx of audio they will sound identical. What you put into the transmitter comes out of the receiver assuming there isn't a fault. FM maintains a low background noise longer than AM and the only difference is at low signal levels when FM very quickly becomes totally unreadable. AM can still be heard and understood, depending on the ability of the person listening. With all the noise in an aircraft a little bit of low level background noise is not significant. Digital has some merit but again when the signal reaches a threshold it stops completely. The whole thread is futile as the centre of the 'aviation universe' may well be the US but you aren't going to get the rest of the world to change. Even having regultions which are supposed to be accepted worldwide doesn't work. Most counties have exceptions. About the only thing which is standard is the use of the English language. Even then the locals will use their own language! Have you ever worked controllers with Spanish English, Finnish English, Canadian English, New Zealand English, Cyprus English, Bahamian, Caribbean or even Amereican English. That's where the differences can be heard. AM radio is adequate for the job and if you don't think so then get your installation checked out by a qualified engineer, you may be suprised. As for increasing the number of frequencies Europe has introduced 8.3KHz spacing. Fortunately at the lower GA flight levels it's not required but the higher commercials now require new radios. Most radios are dual NAV/COM so not only would you need a new COM but a new NAV too... It isn't going to happen...! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |