![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Probably the greatest use of your device is for figuring out the lapse rate rather than cloud height. Get the cloud height and surface temperature from METAR, use your device to get the cloud temperature and calculate the lapse rate. A lapse rate higher than 2C/1000' will indicate an unstable atmosphere and bumpy flight conditions. Unlike the temperatures from the winds aloft forecast, yours will be actual temperature, not forecasted, and will be more accurate. Also, winds aloft data forecast is not accurate for calculating stability near the surface, as the temperature is omitted for the first 3000'. Extrapolating between surface and 6000' may not accurately reflect the instability close to the ground. 2C per thousand has nothing to do with stability. In unsaturated air, 2C/1000 is stable. In saturated air 2C/1000 is unstable. 2C/1000 is the standard for calibrating altimeters, it has nothing to do with the real atmosphere or stability. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Price of Flying Wires? | PWK | Home Built | 34 | October 8th 17 08:24 PM |
Cloud Tops/bases forecast? | David | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 20th 04 10:08 PM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |