![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:31:08 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote: "Gerald Sylvester" wrote: [snip] So with my reasoning which certainly could be far off base, I guess my question is, do you consider taking friends and family into hard IMC that risky. Solid IMC? sure and without hesitation. Solid IMC and turbulence, the occasional embedded TS, or ice. Not a chance. I wouldn't take friends and family without another pilot on a flight down to minimums but I'm wondering if IFR in It depends on two things. How much you fly and your comfort factor. I find flying down to minimums little different than breaking out a 100 or 200 feet above minimums. anything but turbine powered aircraft is just outright stupid in a way. It's too risky, IMO, to take my family into large areas of very low IMC in my SE airplane. There just aren't enough "outs" available in case of trouble. Neither will I depart with non-pilot pax aboard if the airport is at or below minimums. To me, IFR isn't all that different than VFR any more. If find that to be true even in solid IMC. Where I draw the line with passengers is turbulence. I was lucky I had instructors who put me through a lot of IMC right down to minimums so by the time I received my rating I felt competent (and comfortable) to fly down to minimums and did. Actually my first solo IFR flight was near minimums on both ends. Coming home it was forecast to be below minimums for 3BS, but above for MBS which is just 11.3 miles and they have and ILS. Had to file FNT as the alternate, but you can go any where. Shot the VOR-A into 3BS and it was good, but 10 minutes earlier, or later and it would have been doing the missed to the ILS at MBS and having my wife pick me up. A couple miles either side of the approach was well below minimums. When I called the airport in site, there was a pause and APP asked what conditions looked like. As far as passengers I really don't see it as any more risky than VFR, but I won't take inexperienced passengers into solid IMC. I don't like cleaning airplanes. True, I fly over the mid west which is mostly flat land and if it's minimums or above you can make a visual landing ... somewhere. OTOH there are a *lot* of densely wooded areas. I look at it this way. *If* I'm comfortable with the conditions I'll take friends and family. If I find the "pucker factor" to be uncomfortable, I not only won't take friends and family, I won't go either. My life is every bit as important to me as any one else's. My basic rule, which is very easy to keep; I won't take some one else where I wouldn't go. :-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Good plans-built Light Sport Aircraft | Rob Schneider | Home Built | 15 | August 19th 04 05:50 PM |
DCPilots for Washington, DC area pilots | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 5th 04 12:32 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |