![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote:
Mary and I have flown coast to coast, for 12 years and 1500+ hours, all VFR. It's easy, it's fun, and it's never a problem, as long as you're flexible. Now, of course, would I *prefer* to use ATC? Sure! We use VFR flight following on virtually every flight, and we enjoy visiting big-city airports. But if the FAA imposes user fees based on ATC use, it would be child's play to stop talking to them -- especially now that we have XM weather on-board. I also fly VFR only but it is easy where I live (Colorado). I also use ATC for flight following, going into towered airports, get clearance into Denver Class B, etc. But impose fees (I already pay via fuel taxes) then expect all these non-essential ATC contacts to go away. Go to Pueblo for breakfast? Not with a fee. Go to COS to refuel? Not with a fee. Talk to Denver to help with their traffic flow? Sorry. Talk to COS to minimize impacts to commercial aircraft that fly over my airport? I would like to BUT. Flight following? I will take the chance and use my 406 beacon if needed. Pre flight briefing? Internet In some cases that may have negative safety implications. Ron Lee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An ACE goes down in flames. | PoBoy | Naval Aviation | 25 | December 9th 05 01:30 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |