![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
May I make some suggestions? (1) Do not change OLC rules mid-season. (2) If you insist on checking all traces for certain violations, do it at the time of claim -- automatically -- and reject those that do not pass, there and then. Going back through the season and arbitrarily hand-picking "bad" flights seems like huge waste of time -- yours and everybody else's. More generally, I can't help but notice that OLC has become a much worse place since SSA got involved. It started with a huge ugly STATIONARY banner on top of SSA-OLC page that serves no good purpose but to generate advertisement income for SSA at the expense of users' screen space. I checked other national OLCs, and the ONLY three out of 29 that do this tasteless disservice to their users are AT, FR and US. Now this policing of the traces. OLC used to be an extremely valuable tool for sharing and learning. I used to rave about it and promote it to all my soaring friends. Still, I estimate that only about one-third of the pilots I know post their flights. Which is a pity, because those who do NOT post tend to be the more experienced and wiser pilots. See any connection? You can count the "stages" in the "process", but I do not see how you can count on the last one being acceptance. Many did not accept OLC to begin with and still fewer will if the current trends with SSA-OLC continue. The rate of participation will be further diminishing, as will be the value of the OLC to the rest of us. Pity. Once again, U.S.A. shows the way. Thank you. -- Yuliy Gerchikov "Doug Haluza" wrote in message oups.com... This is cross posted from the SSA Home News & Information General News: As the days get shorter as the end of the soaring season nears, the SSA-OLC Committee has been receiving complaints about flights after sunset without required aircraft lighting. Although the requirements for night flight begin at twilight for pilots in the US, the requirements for aircraft lighting begin at sunset. Gliders without approved lighting must land, and move clear of lighted runways and taxiways before sunset. IGC flight logs contain a GPS time stamp which is the most exact time standard readily available. So, violations of this requirement are quite plain to see in these logs. The SSA Board was concerned about flight logs with obvious violations damaging the sport if they were posted in the public record of the OLC. So the board adopted a policy disqualifying such flights from the OLC, as well as FAI awards such as badges and records. See: http://www.ssa.org/download/SSA%20Po...Violations.pdf The SSA-OLC Committee prefers that pilots voluntarily remove the flights, rather than having them removed by an admin. We have contacted a number of pilots to request this, and they are currently in various stages of the 5-step grieving process (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance). You can avoid this emotional roller coaster by planning and executing your flights to be complete before sunset, unless you have approved night lighting. You can't just duct tape a flashlight to the nose for night flight. The requirements for navigation lights are very specific to color, intensity and direction. If your aircraft is equipped with approved night lighting, and it was used for flight after sunset, you must put a note in the comments section of the OLC claim form explaining this. We also have been advised of flight claims that show altitudes in the log well above the 18,000' MSL limit for Class-A airspace in the US. The IGC logger altitude is subject to a number of errors, which could total to several hundred feet. We are currently reviewing with the pilots a number of flights that appear to exceed even a reasonable error budget. Note that unless your flight reference altimeter has been properly calibrated for IFR flight, and is set to a current ATC altimeter setting, you will need to allow an extra buffer below 18,000' MSL indicated altitude to account for possible errors. If you have an encounter with an IFR aircraft with calibrated altitude references, the calibrated references and ATC logs will be used to determine your actual altitude in any subsequent investigation. Again, if your flight log shows flight above 18,000 MSL, after correcting for field elevation at takeoff, you will need to provide an explanation in the comments section of the OLC claim form explaining this. The same requirement applies to entering special use airspace. This will immediately answer any questions that may concern other competitors, or anyone else reviewing your flight log in the future. Finally, if you note a flight that appears to be questionable, do not speculate in public forums (like news://rec.avation.soaring). Contact the pilot privately if you can. If the flight is in the US, contact the SSA-OLC Committee by email at olcatssadotorg. Or use the complaint tab on the OLC Web header to initiate a partner check. Doug Haluza SSA-OLC Admin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |