![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Copeland writes:
The repeater initiates the call on your behalf. The repeater is queued rather than the analog radio. Likewise, the reply goes to the repeater, which then re-RXs ("repeats") as analog. For this to work, the analog and digitial systems must have their own frequencies. Is there a guarantee that transmissions will occur within a certain period? Are these systems verified for safety-of-life applications? Also, the concept of "emergency" call is also very useful. For example, it places you at the top of the queue. Combine "emergency" with a GPS source, plus data services, and now your squawking 7700, your GPS position is sent with your PTT, and you now have priority with the controller. Interesting. This does bring to mind something else, though: If your channels are so crowded that you need a system to queue messages and give priority for emergencies, you need more channels. It's much safer to have multiple channels that don't require queuing than it is to queue on a single channel. Also, how do you deal with analog users who have no queuing? They will still walk over the simultaneous transmissions in digital and analog. An anachronism? ![]() Actually they would be, since practices extended to digital users would naturally tend to affect analog users, even though they don't have the same advantages. This would put them at a safety risk. Until everyone is converted, such features would simply be a perk to controllers; with the potential to increase QoS for those that digitally participate. Quality of service has to translate to increased safety in my book. As I've said, if fancy queuing systems are required just to manage traffic on the channel, then there are not enough channels, digital or otherwise. Oh, most definiately not web browsing. TAFs, METARS, in route weather, PIREPs, TFRs, ATIS, ASOS, TWEB, NAV IDs, etc... As long as someone is still actually flying the plane. A beautiful digital display of weather 300 nm ahead doesn't help if it distracts you from the mountainside looming just ahead through the cockpit window. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |