A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Important message for SSA members



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old September 7th 06, 09:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bela Szalai
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Important message for SSA members

I guess we need to agree on what "better" means.
Size vs. influence?
We would have a 14K ceiling (Class A) for the past two decades without the
AOPA.

- Béla


------Original Message-----
-From: Glider Pilot Network ]
-Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:06 PM
-To: Bela Szalai
-Subject: [r.a.s] Important message for SSA members
-
-------------------------------------------------------------
-Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring
-Subject: Important message for SSA members
-Author:
-Date/Time: 20:00 07 September 2006
-------------------------------------------------------------
-If SSA were to merge with a larger organization, EAA would be
-better suited than AOPA. The EAA already has a number of
-Divisions & Affiliates under its umbrella, including:
-
-International Aerobatic Club
-http://www.iac.org/
-
-Vintage Aircraft Association
-http://www.vintageaircraft.org/
-
-War Birds of America
-http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/
-
-National Association of Flight Instructors
http://www.nafinet.org/
-
-EAA Ultralights
-http://www.eaa.org/ultralights/index.html
-
-Sport Pilot and Light Sport Aircraft Assoc.
-http://www.sportpilot.org/
-
-Young Eagles
-http://www.youngeagles.org/
-
-and there are more....... Each of these groups has its own
-magazine and identity.
-
-EAA promotes and fully supports each and every one of these
-organizations. Makes sense that a soaring division of EAA
-would fit nicely with these other groups.
-
-In my opinion, SSA is just too small to efficiently manage
-itself logistically and financially.
-
-Jon B.
-GA
-
-
-
-Stan - VA wrote:
- I think it is pretty clear that if the SSA survives this latest bout
-of
- mismanagment that our dues will mainly go to debt payment,
-and not to
- services for members.
-
- Several of us at our club have considered the pros and cons of the
- AOPA idea. It definitely is worth discussing.
-
- The AOPA has some real lobbying power. If the SSA ever had any, it
- won't now. The amount of $ SSA had, has, or will have to spend on
- lobbying efforts probably won't even open the door for us
-with anyone
- in Washington. AOPA's clout is another matter.
-
- I don't know that the AOPA would be interested, but 16,000 pilots
- would be a healthy addition to their membership, if that is what the
- SSA membership is. Of course, some SSA are already AOPA members.
-
- A couple of pages monthly in the AOPA magizine would probably do
- soaring a world of good. Most of the potential pilots for our sport
- are already power pilots.
-
- AIG, the insurer who underwrites the policies that come from
- Costello's, already has a relationship with the AOPA. Probably
- Costello's has a relationship with the AOPA too. Hopefully, we
- maintain our insurance in its present form.
-
- Let's face the reality of the situation. We may soon have
-no national
- soaring umbrella organization. We will need to deal with
-that in some
- fashion. Better to think about the alternatives now.
-
- Stan Scott - VA
-
- Tony Verhulst wrote:
- Nyal Williams wrote:
- We have always wanted to be more like the BGA. Do you believe
- that, comprising 1% of the pilot population, we would
-receive any
- notice inside AOPA? Maybe one page near the back of the
-magazine
- -- occasionally.
-
- Would we receive any notice inside AOPA? No! Not even
-inside EAA nor
- even NAFI. Case in point, I used to be a NAFI (National Association
-of
- Flight Instructors) member. In one of their monthly (mailed)
- newsletters (2002), they warned us that the PTS (practical Test
- Standard)was changing and to make sure that we trained our
-students
- to the new standards. When I researched the matter I
-discovered that
- ONLY the
- *airplane* PTS was changing - not glider, not helicopter, ... you
- get the picture. I wrote a nice letter to the organization
-president
- and editor explaining the situation and requested a public
-clarification.
-I
- got nowhere - not even a clarification in their online newsletter
- which would have cost them nothing to distribute. After several
- polite email exchanges, I realized that unless you were an
-airplane
- instructor you were nothing and that there was no point in
-me being
- a member. I resigned in protest.
-
- Expect similar treatment if we become part of AOPA.
-
- Tony V. CFIG
- http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING
-
-
-------------------------------------------------------------
-





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon Aviation Marketplace 1 June 12th 04 03:03 AM
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon General Aviation 0 June 12th 04 02:14 AM
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon Owning 0 June 12th 04 02:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.