![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-09-08, Grumman-581 grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM wrote:
No, a patent on the idea of using TCP/IP for communication between various systems aboard an aircraft... Or maybe it's a copywrite... Whatever... It could be either or both. The code would be copyrighted by default, and the method itself could be patented. However, just like most patents issued by the USPTO today, it's barely worthy of a patent because it's just so obvious to control devices using data passed down some data connection (such as TCP/IP). I suspect they used TCP/IP rather than concocting their own control protocol because TCP/IP (for all its warts) is well understood and TCP/IP stacks are ubiquitous on virtually any device (including microcontrollers) with even trivial amounts of processing power - thus reducing development costs. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |