![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ramy wrote: This is an interesting assumption. I didn't dig my insurance policy yet, but I don't recall that violations are excluded. I think, like car accidents, you are covered whether it is your fault or not. Wow - it's amazing pilots are so oblivious on their insurance coverage (don't take that personally Ramy). In point of fact, insurance companies can and will find every possible reason to avoid paying a claim. Violation of FARs is one of the first places they will look. This includes but is not limited to: - Airworthiness of the aircraft (ship is within anual inspection, required intrumentation operatinge, etc.). - Pilot is properly qualified for the flight (cockpit checkouts, Flight Review, etc.) - Operation is conducted within FARs - etc. The concept of "no fault" primarily exists in some personal auto policies (depending on the state) and all worker's compensation policies. Other than that, fault is absolutely one of the first things that is looked at. Imagine the scenario where a collision occurs between a glider at 18,500 and a Piper Malibu on a flight plan. In the best case, let's assume that both the Piper and glider pilot escape with their lives. Now, there's this little problem of $500K worth of damage to the Piper in addition to the written-off glider. The insurance company for the Piper figures out that the glider shouldn't have been there and immediately subrogates to collect back their $500K from the glider pilot's insurance company. At the trial, it is determined early on that the glider pilot was in fact not cleared into Class A airpspace. Guess who is going to be stuck, not only with the cost of their glider, but the $500K in damages to the Piper as well? Hint: It's not the glider pilot's insurance company, nor is it the Piper pilot's insurance company. My firm is currently managing the claims information systems for one of the 800lb gorillas in the global insurance business. We see that they contract out investigations for especially costly aviation incidents to specialists who do nothing but try to find out if one party or the other was operating outside of the regs. These sorts of folks are pilots like us, and they will use every method (including some pretty unethical approaches) to make sure their employer doesn't get stuck with a $500K bill if they can help it. Bottom line: Operating at the margins our outside of the FARs will mor than likely invalidate your insurance in the event of a claim and may have very severe financial repurcussions for the pilot. For more on this, you can check out this sobering article by John Yodice in AOPA Pilot Magazine: http://www.aopaia.com/display_article_07.cfm Erik Mann |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial - StrePla Update | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | May 19th 04 02:52 PM |