![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug wrote: Highly unlikely you will keep the plane for 40 years. Practically unheard of. One more reason why the mainland is different from Hawai'i... Two guys at the airport have had their Cessnas for the better part of 50 years now, one guy has a Cherokee Six he's had for 30, before that he had a Piper cub for 20. Lot's of Beech Volpars are still in service with the same people (or their grand-children) with which they were in service beggining in the 30s, while one cargo airline (Kamaka Air) flies DC-3s that it had fully restored, which I believe were old Trans-Pacific (Aloha Airlines) DC-3s. I would recommend buying a single, non-retract airplane that will carry the load you need to carry. Cessna 172 or 182 or a Piper Warrior or Pathfinder. Retractable gear is a maintenance headache. With your short hops, speed doesn't really matter. I would also recommend buying it with the avionics you want, although with 10K in shipping costs you may have a hard time finding exactly whay you want in Hawaii. Call me fickle, self-oriented, greedy, snobby, what have you, but I do not fly and will not own a fixed-gear plane. As for leaseback, a simple plane like a 172 or Warrior will rent MUCH more often and the required insurance premium and required 100 hour inspections will dictate that you rent it as much as possible if you want to have any hope at all of breaking even or better. Yes, but it will rent to people who wil bust it up too, I'm not looking for volume, I'm looking for people who are willing to spend a bit more than they normally would to get a premium product, which I can think of at least 4 already. If I were in your shoes I would either get a 172 or a 182, one of the later models (1999 or so), but not a new one. New airplanes depreciate a LOT the first year, so I'd let someone else take that hit. However an older model that has the avionics I want, if I can find it, would do even better financially, but would not have the newer planes reliability. If you prefer the Piper line, then choose one of those. No fixed gear, I would entertain a 182RG, but the 235 HP engine puts a big bump up in that insurance over the 200 hp one in the 177 and the Arrow, also I in particular dislike 172s for their stall characteristics, they seem to break quickly and fall rather than stall out. Good luck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anti collision light mod for Piper Arrow 1968 model? | Frode Berg | Owning | 4 | May 20th 04 05:16 AM |
$15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Aviation Marketplace | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
$15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Owning | 18 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
$15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Piloting | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
Piper Archer III or Cessna 172SP | Dale Harwell | Owning | 10 | July 15th 03 04:01 AM |