![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: Congrats!
: : Now remember, IFR in a light plane can only really safely go in about : 20% of the instrument weather mother nature can throw at you. : : However, an instrument rated pilot can go in about 40% of the VFR : weather that would have been too risky for a VFR-only pilot to attempt, : due to the the risk of weather closing in being too great. : : Therefore paradoxically, by getting an instrument rating you will find : yourself flying a lot more VFR than you had before :-) : Uh, ok. That's not the case for me, nor most of the pilots I know. I can say that it *is* the case for me. Being in Virginia with most cross-country flights to the north or northwest, actually flying IFR in a non-high-performance piston-pounder is often less safe than VFR. Between the convective activity in the summer, and the icing in the 6000' MEA's over West Virginia, *filing* is often a fool's game. Flying 1500' AGL VFR is safer than getting stuck in VMC on top of an icing layer IMO. I don't know if I quite agree with your 20% of instrument weather number or 40% of the VFR weather. I'd probably double those numbers so long as you stay current. Of course... there are some that say that flying IMC in a single is unsafe at any speed. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|