A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rudder for final runway alignment (?)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old September 26th 06, 06:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Rudder for final runway alignment (?)

T o d d P a t t i s t writes:

The direct sensation of acceleration is reliable, but like
the instruments has imperfect accuracy.


A sensation of acceleration alone is of limited utility. Unless you
can integrate the accelerations over time in a very accurate way, they
don't tell you much about where you are, or what attitude you are in.

The integrated
value of acceleration that you do in your head produces an
estimate of speed, and that value is less reliable. The
second integration that you do in your head is position, and
that value is even less reliable.


Yup.

I've been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but
you're not trying hard to understand this. Perhaps this
will make it clear - A full motion simulator can produce an
excellent simulation of many of the sensations we are
discussing. It's obvious that the full motion simulator
does not move thousands of feet the way that an airplane
does. How does it achieve excellent simulation without
moving out of the simulation box? It can do that because
humans are good at sensing accelerations, but not in
integrating them to get velocity or double integrating to
get position. The full motion sim matches the accelerations
pretty closely, but not so closely that it needs to really
leave the building that houses the sim.

The same thing happens in instrument flight and in VFR
flight - the pilot uses the sensed accelerations to fly, but
uses the horizon - either real or AI instrument simulated to
recalibrate his awareness of position and attitude. Without
the horizon, his beleif in position and attitude starts to
drift away from reality. He's excellent at detecting when
he starts to accelerate away from his current
position/attitude, but lousy at knowing what the current
position/attitude is.


So it would seem that the only utility of sensation is in assessing
extremely short-term movements of the aircraft. You may sense that
you've started to climb or descend, but you don't know how far, or how
fast. For movements and commands that take place over the scale of
seconds, that might be moderately useful, but beyond that it seems
that it's just good for feeling warm and fuzzy.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SWRFI - next weekend! Richard Lamb Home Built 13 May 10th 06 03:45 AM
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work ContestID67 Soaring 0 March 30th 06 07:36 PM
Southern California airports have worst runway safety records Larry Dighera Piloting 0 November 26th 05 04:48 PM
Information on A310 that lost it's rudder enroute to Canada from Cuba Corky Scott Piloting 3 March 27th 05 03:49 PM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.