![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T o d d P a t t i s t writes:
The direct sensation of acceleration is reliable, but like the instruments has imperfect accuracy. A sensation of acceleration alone is of limited utility. Unless you can integrate the accelerations over time in a very accurate way, they don't tell you much about where you are, or what attitude you are in. The integrated value of acceleration that you do in your head produces an estimate of speed, and that value is less reliable. The second integration that you do in your head is position, and that value is even less reliable. Yup. I've been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you're not trying hard to understand this. Perhaps this will make it clear - A full motion simulator can produce an excellent simulation of many of the sensations we are discussing. It's obvious that the full motion simulator does not move thousands of feet the way that an airplane does. How does it achieve excellent simulation without moving out of the simulation box? It can do that because humans are good at sensing accelerations, but not in integrating them to get velocity or double integrating to get position. The full motion sim matches the accelerations pretty closely, but not so closely that it needs to really leave the building that houses the sim. The same thing happens in instrument flight and in VFR flight - the pilot uses the sensed accelerations to fly, but uses the horizon - either real or AI instrument simulated to recalibrate his awareness of position and attitude. Without the horizon, his beleif in position and attitude starts to drift away from reality. He's excellent at detecting when he starts to accelerate away from his current position/attitude, but lousy at knowing what the current position/attitude is. So it would seem that the only utility of sensation is in assessing extremely short-term movements of the aircraft. You may sense that you've started to climb or descend, but you don't know how far, or how fast. For movements and commands that take place over the scale of seconds, that might be moderately useful, but beyond that it seems that it's just good for feeling warm and fuzzy. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWRFI - next weekend! | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 13 | May 10th 06 03:45 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
Southern California airports have worst runway safety records | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 05 04:48 PM |
Information on A310 that lost it's rudder enroute to Canada from Cuba | Corky Scott | Piloting | 3 | March 27th 05 03:49 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |