![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Gould writes:
And, how many centuries do expect we should wait to find out whether you're right about that? It could happen tomorrow. Your notion of "private planes" is pretty narrow if you think they'll be eliminated by closing airports. That's not what I think. But it would take very little to see all PPLs suspended indefinitely in the U.S. One nutcase crashing into a city with a load of anthrax aboard in his private plane, and you could all say goodbye to your "right" to be private pilots. Things can happen fast when hysteria rules, and hysteria is increasingly the norm in society. Right now, private pilots are protected by the fact that most of the public doesn't know anything about private pilots, and so they don't object to them. But put this type of aviation into the spotlight, and people will start to worry about it (with help from the media and politicians), until there is an outcry for "protection" from the "dangers" of letting "anyone" fly. Using GA airports for anything with a broad consumer base, such as conventional commercial airlines, would risk drawing too much attention to them and their users. Since most people don't care about any type of aviation except the type that takes them where they want to do, they'd rather close and airport and prevent non-commercial pilots from flying than take the "risk" of "terrorists" threatening the country with their little planes. Is that what you want? Around here, there are a significant number of _private airports_ on large parcels of _private land_ with pilots that share these resources so that other _private planes_ have a place to come and go at will. That could change overnight. Unless someone starts confiscating property en masse, I can't see your vision coming true. Private aviation could be prohibited with a stroke of the pen. Private pilots are not numerous enough in society to prevent this from happening, or to reverse it once it occurs. They are a tiny minority, protected from the majority by near-invisibility. If they make themselves too visible, they become targets of opportunity. And, should someone decide to start confiscating property en masse, I'd point out that pilots are the single most heavily armed group of citizens that I know of short of those that belong to a militia as a hobby. Unless they intend to overthrow the government, that doesn't matter. And if they do intend to overthrow the government, then perhaps there might be some justification to the concerns that the rest of society might have. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 48 | October 5th 04 11:46 AM |
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs | Orval Fairbairn | General Aviation | 46 | October 5th 04 11:46 AM |
Chicago Meigs Airport Dead | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 4 | April 16th 04 10:40 PM |
a brief blurb on meigs | Tune2828 | Piloting | 0 | January 20th 04 04:04 PM |
Emergency landing at Meigs Sunday | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 22 | August 3rd 03 03:14 PM |