A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is every touchdown a stall?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #35  
Old October 2nd 06, 11:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Is every touchdown a stall?

A normal approach is at 1.5 Vs until on final approach to
allow for maneuvering flight. Once on final, where bank
angles will be less than 15 degrees, with little effect on
stall speed/load factor, speed will be 1.3 Vs until
beginning the flare or round out. Actual touchdown will
happen at 1.1 to 1.01 Vs. On really short fields that are
not "soft" actually stalling at 1 to 2 feet AGL and dropping
it in is well within the design limits of the landing gear
and wing.

Real airplanes and real simulators "care" about such
details, desktop PC games and simulators don't, which is why
you can log take-offs and landings in an airplane or a $20
million full motion/visual sim.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
...
| Mxsmanic wrote:
|
|
| You don't need to stall the aircraft to descend. It can
fly and
| descend at the same time. If you do this above a
runway, you end up
| landing. If the rate of descent is gentle, you land
very gently.
|
| It's easy to "land" with a minimum rate of descent by
carrying extra
| power. This is however, not advisable. As I pointed out
earlier
| you're going to have to disapate that energy (and may not
be able to
| before you run out of runway). Further, you'll have a
lower pitch
| attitude and in most planes it's the mains you want to
take the
| brunt of the landing force with, not the nosewheel.
|
| Flying into the ground with excess energy is *NOT* good
technique.
|
|
| As I understand it, a stall is a sudden change in the
aerodynamics of
| the aircraft.
|
| Your understanding is as usual, incorrect.
| This would be all the more true
| under rough landing conditions, when you need to have
precise control
| of the aircraft at all times. Y It doesn't sound like
something you'd want when you are
| only a few feet above the runway. es, I can see how
you'd need a longer
| runway, but if you're in a small aircraft, very often
you have runway
| to spare, anyway.
|
| Again you persist to think that stalls somehow destroy
controllability,
| which is not the case.
|
| I don't know if my techniques are valid, but I seem to
be having more
| luck with safe landings since I started watching
airspeed carefully to
| avoid anything like a stall.
|
|
| No you have had good luck playing games on the computer.
You have
| not demoonstrated squat with regard to airplanes.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Tamed by the Tailwheel [email protected] Piloting 84 January 18th 05 04:08 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM
Wing Extensions Jay Home Built 22 July 27th 03 12:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.