![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Aluckyguess" wrote in message
... Bottom line the wing needs airspeed to fly. At a certain speed the wing starts to lift, when it loses this speed, losing lift it stalls. IMHO, this is a misleading description of stalling, and in fact will lead to just the confusion the original poster describes. Specifically, the wing's speed is really not directly related to stalling at all. As others have explained, the reason a stall speed is published is that it is true that at a given weight and load factor (eg max gross and 1g), there is a specific amount of lift required, and there is a specific speed associated with the angle of attack that can produce that lift. The published stalling speed is simply a speed at which the angle of attack required to achieve the necessary lift at that speed is the same as the critical (stalling) angle of attack. It is not true that under all conditions, at that speed, the wing is stalled (or "when it loses this speed, losing lift it stalls"). The wing loses lift because it stalls, not the other way around. And the wing will only stall at a given airspeed if its angle of attack exceeds the critical angle of attack. This is true of any airspeed, above or below the published stall speed(s). Stick your hand out the window of your car shape it like a wing at a certain speed it will lift all by itself and basically be weightless. However, as long as you keep your "hand wing" angle of attack below the critical angle of attack, it will generate lift at ANY speed above 0. There is no "stalling speed" for your hand in that scenario, as your hand is not required to support itself with lift, and so there is no speed at which the required angle of attack equals or exceeds the critical angle of attack. (That is, there's not even a concept of "the required angle of attack" in that case...your hand will fly along quite happily at any amount of lift, or even zero lift). Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |