![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dudley Henriques wrote: "new_CFI" wrote in message ... I guess he means precession. If you roll fast enogh, your aircraft acts as a gyroscope. Now apply a force perpendicular to the roll axis, and the result will be a precession motion which can be pretty impressive. ok, I knew it must have soemthing to do with a gyro....I couldnt reason it out...but this makes sence. I hope your right...or else ill just have to go back to being confused again. That's a shame it makes sense, as its not correct, and understanding all things related to flying are worth knowing as a flight instructor. There's really no reason for any instructor to be "confused" when a little research will enhance understanding. If you are actually interested in inertia coupling, perhaps a little bit of research might bring you up to speed on it. If not, please accept my sincere apology for having mentioned it. Dudley Henriques Googling "inertia coupling" I found this, which cleared things up a bit (at least for me): A few of the experimental aircraft encountered a new type of behavior known as inertia coupling, a behavior that was not fully appreciated until the F-100 and F-102 also encountered it. Inertia coupling resulted from the tendency of the new generation of high-speed aircraft to concentrate most of the weight in a long thin fuselage, a departure from the distribution of subsonic fighters. The X-3 configuration is an excellent illustration. Even though its high-speed performance was disappointing, the X-3's unanticipated susceptibility to loss of control from inertia coupling contributed to understanding the problem. With much less weight in the wing and tail, the dynamic motion in a maneuver could cause the inertia of the fuselage to overpower the aerodynamic stabilizing forces of the wing and tail. In the worst cases the pilot lost control and the resulting abnormal air loads caused airframe structural failure. The early F-100A models are remembered as a classic example of susceptibility to inertia coupling, although the initial F-102A models also encountered the problem. --Walt Bozeman, Montana |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|