|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
January 4th 05, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Gary Drescher wrote: In this case, the suggestion is for a normal descent rate, rather than a steep approach. (Again, though, the regulation that specifies a normal descent rate is not pertinent here.) There is no difference because the only rule that governs descending below the minimum instrument altitude on an IAP is the 91.175 stuff pertaining to descent below MDA (forgetting DA/H) in this case. That applies whether he has reached the stepdown fix or not. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are pilots really good or just lucky??? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 68 | December 9th 04 01:53 PM |
| Canadian departure minimums? | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 9th 04 01:43 PM |
| Can ATC assign an airway if filed direct? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | March 4th 04 12:23 AM |
| Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |
| CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |
Threaded Mode