![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cjcampbell writes:
The reason we use jet engines is that they are inherently more powerful and they can operate at high altitudes where the efficiency penalty compared to piston engines is less. At high speeds, drag is a more important factor in fuel economy than engine efficiency, so jet airliners get their best fuel economy at high altitude. But for short hauls where it would just be a waste of fuel to climb to high altitude and descend again, a turboprop will deliver more power than a piston engine with greater fuel economy than a jet. There are still the questions of simplicity and reliability, which I thought were both higher for gas turbines. They are certainly more reliable; and I should think they'd be simpler, too. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 02:55 PM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
U.S. Air Force Moves Ahead With Studies On Air-Breathing Engines | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 03:31 AM |