![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wouldn't pitch and power have arrested the descent faster than power alone?
Pitch alone would have translated forward momentum into a climb, which would have increased altitude but would have also slowed the aircraft significantly. Perhaps the pilot was too close to stall for that. I have also read that pilots approach the deck with full throttle so that they can go around if the arresting hook fails to catch a cable on the deck. My days as a Naval Aviator ended in 1954. Carrier approaches were made quite differently from today's. We dragged around the base leg just above the altitude of the deck at whatever power it took to maintain airspeed just above a stall, and chopped the power when (if) we we got a cut. Today, approaches are "straight in," a lot like a VASI or ILS approach. Power is not "full," it is whatever it takes to stay on glide slope and correct airspeed. When the wheels hit the deck, THEN full power is added for a possible go-round. vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheating the ILS | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | September 3rd 06 04:22 PM |
Cheating the Reaper! | JJS | Piloting | 7 | July 19th 06 03:34 PM |
Blair Manipulated Intelligence to Justify War, says BBC film | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 05 06:45 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |