![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sam Spade" wrote in message
news:UOSWg.32348$tO5.22560@fed1read10... Beavis wrote: In article 0wDWg.32302$tO5.12002@fed1read10, Sam Spade wrote: Runway edge lights, unlike CL lights, are mandatory for a night takeoff under Part 121. Not at my Part 121 airline. From our FAA-approved manual: "Runway lighting is required by FAR 121.97 for takeoff or landing at night. Centerline lights are considered adequate in the event that the runway edge lights are inoperative." That is an authorized substitution. It doesn't changed 121.97. That's actually wrong. FAR 121.97 says *nothing* about forbidding runway ops on an unlighted runway. Nor have I found any FAR that does that. 121.97 goes to operator requirements WRT airports and disseminating information on them to their flight crews. An airline's FOM might forbid using unlit runways, but there's no requirement that such a rule be included in its FOM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |