|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
January 5th 05, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Agreed.
I think the answer is simple. Aren't Part 97 instrument approach procedures required fy FARs? In which case, all minimum altitudes depicted on approach plates must be obeyed. 91.175 allows descent below MDA or dh when certain paramenters are met. But not descent below other minimum altitudes on the app procedure Stan On 4 Jan 2005 23:19:26 -0800, wrote: No, you cannot, unless you first... - cancel IFR, or - get a visual approach clearance, or - get a contact approach clearance You might get away with it, though, if you just call in to ATC, "runway in sight" before descending. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are pilots really good or just lucky??? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 68 | December 9th 04 01:53 PM |
| Canadian departure minimums? | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 9th 04 01:43 PM |
| Can ATC assign an airway if filed direct? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | March 4th 04 12:23 AM |
| Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |
| CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |
Threaded Mode