![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Anderson Cooper 360 about last night, (at least) one of their
sources pointed out that to make the tight turn to compelte the u-turn at that altitude and turning left, a very steep bank is needed, and that this can cause a los of altitude -- and the radar returns indicate that 200' was lost during the turn. IIRC, William Langewiesche talks about this in his Atlantic article (Dec '93, it seems), and maybe in Stick and Rudder (Stick and Rudder: An Explanation of the Art of Flying by Wolfgang Langewiesche, William Langewiesche, ISBN: 0070362408 Pub. Date: September 1990). I don't have a copy in front of me (of either -- the Atlantic article is not one of the non-subscription ones, unlike the EgyptAir article). Does anyone have additional information? I know, the official version won't be available for months, but there will gradually be information available that will add to our picture. Which apartment was the engine found in, btw -- the point of original contact? A sidebar is that the pilot for the TV report siad, "this is very busy space...I wouldn't fly solo here; having someone to do the radio knobs [etc] would make a big difference" (I don't think that's verbatim, but it should be close"). One way some good could come out of this, I hope, is if researchers such as those at Purdue can use this as a check of their WTC models. If properly calibrated, the models should show the difference in damage (see http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060911153219.htm, and better copies of the simulation pictures at the Purdue site). /dps |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|