![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:22:45 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: In simulation, the simulated ATC seems to be very inefficient at spacing aircraft, because practically every fifth aircraft on landing is told to go around. In fact, if you are told to follow someone in for a landing, you can take for granted that he won't clear the runway in time and you'll be told to go around. It's tiresome and frustrating after spending a lot of effort to line things up nicely. It's rare. I can't recall ever being told to go around at Dulles and I can recall only once having a Gulfstream sent around because I was on the runway. It's more common at airports with a lot of instructional That's about my average as well for a bit over 1300 hours. Once, many years ago an small turboprop had to go around at Lansing as I hadn't cleared the runway. A couple years ago at MBS I was told to "keep it in close" and then the guy ahead of me landed on the numbers with a mile taxi to the first turnoff. I did a go around, was still cleared, landed long, made the turn off and a DC-9 was able to land behind me. Had I landed on the numbers the DC-9 would have had to have gone around. activity. People don't clear the runway or mess up the spacing, or don't take off promptly when cleared, etc... I suspect the flight games throw in a few more unexpected incidents, malfunctions, etc... to make the games more interesting. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|