the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran

Defendario wrote:
Mike wrote:
Defendario wrote:
Mike wrote:
Defendario wrote:
Mike wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:

Would the Commander of the Eisenhower task force obey an order to use
nukes without a long diplomatic buildup?
When did the US put nukes back on carriers???

Geez ...

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, I see.
OK dimwit; when did the US put tactical nukes back on her ships???

That could be so now. The navy has missiles that are nuke capable, as
well as aircraft. I can't think of a safer place to keep the stuff for
transportation to the AO. Can you?

"could be" -- LOL. Care you show _anything_ not from some net-based
loon such as yourself which says something other than "could be"?
Nope ...


And you have proof to the contrary? Actually, if you think that there
are no nukes in the Task Force, that's your assertion to prove, isn't it?

Since it's public knowledge that the US removed nukes back in the early
1990's ...

Task Force comprises many vessels, not only CVN
But not SSBNs, dimwit.

Sure about that?

You _really_ think SSBNs are part of any carrier strike group?? LOL


No, but are you sure that SSBN's won't participate in an engagement with
Iran?

Laugh that off, loon.

W/ what nukes dimwit?

What about the LA class attack subs?

They aren't SSBNs, now are they.


Semantics is the last refuge of the loser, as well as ad homs.
I expect them any time now.

Your bread & butter ...

No Tomahawks
aboard those boats?

LOL; reading comprehension a problem? Tactical nuke warheads in the
first place, and second, any and all SSNs are under control of the
commander, carrier strike group??


Is it possible for a Tomahawk to be fitted with a nuke?

Answer that, net loon.

Feel free to show that it's been done, and not only done, that the
commander of the Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (RADM Myers) has
control of them ...


So, where's the proof in the first place that the SSNs are carrying
today Tomahawks w/ nuclear warheads?


Circular reasoning, eh? Demand proof to confirm your own assertions.

You bore me, ****head.

No proof is noted.

The question of whether the Commander will launch WW III without a
declaration is not sophomoric.
It sure as hell is. It's simply another silly comment, one of many in
this thread.

And I think you have gravitas...why?
snicker

double yawn


As I said, and you also bore yourself.

Seems to work on you ...

If Herr Bushler gives such an illegal
order, he should be arrested. I put my faith in a military junta before
I would the NeoCon cabal.
yawn

Go back to sleep, Kook. This convo is for adults only.

And you're no adult, dimwit.


Finally, the ad hom bomb.

Your surrender is accepted.

Your silly childish comments are duly noted.

Recall dimwit, the original post was "Would the Commander of the
Eisenhower task force obey an order to use nukes without a long
diplomatic buildup?"

What nukes does RADM Myers even control in the first place???

Take your time ...