![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Oct 2006 09:27:48 -0700, "
wrote: I flew safety for a friend in his Bonanza A36 w/ IO-550 yesterday. He hand flew a perfect ILS, but it was with full flap and gears down at around 22 in power. In my E35 Bonanza with E225 engine and low flap and gear speeds, I almost always fly ILS with flap up, gears down at around 17 in power. We both fly ILS at around 105 to 115 knots. During lunch, we discussed the pros and cons of full flap ILS. My friend's arguments were that with full flap, when breaking out at minimum for landing, all you have to do is to pull back on the power and land ("get dirty early"). And with higher power setting, less stress is on the engine when going full power for miss and quicker power application (especially when one gets into turbo, turboprop or jet). My landings are all full flap, but I only run about 15 degrees of flap on the ILS. The reason being that if I had to go full power with full flaps that Debonair is a hand full to keep the nose down until you retrim. There is no change in trim with flaps application but there is with speed and power. 40 degrees of flap in the landing configuration and full power will put the nose so far up you'll stall if you don't get it down. Hence my reason for only partial flaps on the ILS. I do have the gear down. The reason for the gear is when flying by the numbers at GS intercept ALL I have to do is put the gear down and I'll be following the GS very close with no other adjustments. Yes, coming in at 105 to 110 knots when the normal landing speed is about 70 knots makes the 30 to 40 knot transition a busy time. My argument against full flap ILS is that that less initial climb performance would be available during miss approach. I feel the time required to retract full flap to approach flap then to no flap would significantly reduce your climb gradient. Going full power with full The Deb goes up like a rocket the first 500 feet with full flaps. flap requires a large change in pitch, but climb rate is not better at full flap because the added drag. In addition, between landing after breaking out at minimum and executing a miss approach, I prefer less workload during the miss. Full power, hold the nose down while the flaps are coming up and retrimming at the same time. It takes about 5 seconds but it is busy! :-)) What are your opinions? Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Negative flaps for better low speed aileron control? | [email protected] | Soaring | 41 | August 25th 05 06:01 AM |
ASW19b best descent rate on approach (full airbrakes) | Robert Sharpe | Soaring | 1 | April 30th 05 11:41 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Flap Hinge Moment Calc | Bo | Home Built | 0 | February 2nd 05 06:01 AM |