![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:53:32 +0000 (UTC),
(Paul Tomblin) wrote: We were talking about cancelling the IFR clearance and proceeding VFR when you piped up with this "you've got to fly the instrument procedure" business. He's not flying a "home-made procedure", he's proceeding VFR. That's not what I recall. The original post started thusly: "On the most recent Pilots Audio Update, the narrator was talking about atime when fog covered half the airport, but he could see the runway he wasgoing to land on, but because the control tower was on the foggy half ofthe airport, they wouldn't approve a visual approach. He was beingvectored all around, and thought it ironic that he never lost sight of therunway. Could he had gotten a contact approach if he'd asked for it?" In other words, the field is IFR. Newps then suggested that one could get an instrument approach and then cut it short and land under IFR..). I don't see where anyone suggested he land VFR. He can't. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | November 1st 04 10:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |