|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
January 19th 05, 01:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Paul stated "canceling when you have sufficient visibility..." which indicates a change in status/condition/visibility (at the point visibility becomes adequate). Paul wasn't following the thread very closely. The message he responded to stated "when an instrument letdown to a civil airport is necessary". As I said, if you can operate under VFR an instrument letdown wouldn't be necessary. Let's see: The message he responded to stated "when an instrument letdown to a civil airport is necessary". Are you saying the gist of the thread was the opposite of this? Your reply infers that there was adequate visibility prior to that. No, you're inferring. I'm trying to figure out why he's addressing an instrument letdown being necessary and your addressing visual letdown. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
| GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | November 1st 04 10:51 PM |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
| Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Threaded Mode