A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glass Panel Longevity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28  
Old October 22nd 06, 03:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Glass Panel Longevity

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:26:37 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

Sylvain writes:

you just made it clear that you do not understand how open
source development works.


I understand exactly how it works, and so does the market, which is
why safety-of-life software (and much other mission-critical software)
tends to be proprietary.


I know I shouldn't do this but... proprietary and safety-of-life
software are linked not because of safety but because of "for profit".
IE they are proprietary because they do not want others to know how
they are doing what they are doing.
Open source would mean providing the source code and they don't want
that. Hence the de compiling and reverse engineering clauses in the
license as well

The only thing difficult about de compiling or disassembling is the
size of the current state and next state arrays for today's
processors. In the days of the 6502 and straight C they were small,
compact, fast, and easy to write.
In the case of compilers and de compilers you only need to change the
two arrays to change languages or processors. Today the arrays for an
assembler/disassemble are huge. What's the size of the instruction set
for a late model Athlon or Pentium? The set for a 6502 or Z80 would
fit onto 4 sheets the size of a bingo card and by chance were referred
to as bingo cards.

Any good software engineer could write a disassembler and decompiler
to turn that proprietary software into readable code, (there's a bit
more to it that but I'll leave it there) BUT who'd want to. You'd then
have to sift through many thousands of lines of code. Any company that
did that would need a team to do the sifting and the feds tend to
frown on the whole process.

In my undergrad work I had to write a compiler in one term. In
graduate school the same class with the same book (different
university) was split between two terms (one of which was 500 level)
and was 8 credit hours instead of 4. They wouldn't let me take it
again :-))
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glass Panel construction DVD [email protected] Home Built 0 July 20th 06 05:41 AM
Glass panel upgrade to a Turbo Arrow? Tauno Voipio Owning 9 March 12th 06 04:29 AM
A Glass Panel for my old airplane? Brenor Brophy Owning 8 July 25th 05 07:36 AM
Glass Panel Scan? G Farris Instrument Flight Rules 6 October 13th 04 04:14 AM
C182 Glass Panel Scott Schluer Piloting 15 February 27th 04 03:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.