![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 07:24 23 October 2006, Bumper wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... So we have heard form two ASH 26 owners. Any DG 800-808 owners want to opine? I have heard the build quality is better on the ASH than the DG, how so? This is best answered by really looking closely at these gliders. And if you're considering buying one, then it may be best to take the time to do this for yourself. I had the opportunity to do that to a degree on the SSA convention floor. I listed what I thought were the pros and cons of each ship to help me decide. Still, I missed a bunch of stuff, like the robustness of the 26's main gear, and many of the smaller things that I only discovered after really exploring the ins and outs of my 26E after taking delivery. Those that know me would vouch for this, I tend to be a perfectionist when it comes to things mechanical. I appreciate things that have been made well .. . . not just on the outside, but also beneath the skin. BTW, advantages I listed for the DG 800 series included: Much better factory web site. More progressive factory, at least in terms of being willing to quickly embrace new ideas and technology like NOAH and 'Piggott hook'. Lower cockpit sides for ease of exit. Two piece wings allow shorter trailer. bumper A couple of DG800 advantages that bumper overlooked. 1) An engine that doesn't cost $17000 to replace. 2) An engine that can be worked on with out having to remove it from the fuselage. While this may not seem like something you will ever have to do you'll want to keep a couple of big friends around for spark plugs changes. I believe there were at least three engines pulled for one problem or another at this years ASA Parowan camp. They also had their own cart to haul the engines around for repairs but I'm not sure if thats a standard 26 option. 3) A superior engine management system (DEI) with manual back up. IMO the engine related issues sum up the big difference between these two ships as performance both in glide and under power are way similar. The 26 has a smoother engine and the 800 has one, which is easier and cheaper to maintain. They are both state of the art ships and you won't be sorry for buying either. DG has done a pretty fair comparison between the 26/800/Ventus 2cM that can be viewed here – http://tinyurl.com/yz4shs |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|