![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas,
I knew you couldn't let this go. Anyway: You're probably right. But the point is, this is not supposed to happen to Cirrus airplanes! Says who? With "this" I meant that Cirrus and comparable airplanes have the same accident rates. From the Cirrus website: "CAPS™ revolutionized general aviation safety by providing an alternative measure of safety to occupants, similar in theory to the role of airbags in automobiles. No other certified general aviation aircraft manufacturer in the world provides this safety feature as standard equipment." I can only understand the notion of "revolutionized general aviation safety" as having a better accident record than other manufacturers. Therefore, as a direct answer to your question, Cirrus says so. Maybe it is proof pilots don't work. You may have a point here which supports my initial theory that just having an additional safety feature does not necessarily make an airplane safer. Gerd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trip report: Cirrus SR-22 demo flight | Jose | Piloting | 13 | September 22nd 06 11:08 PM |
Wing Loadings (was SR22 discussion) | john smith | Piloting | 8 | June 23rd 06 11:41 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time | Lenny Sawyer | Owning | 4 | March 6th 04 09:22 AM |