![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting question, but the MAP is the MAP and if you do not have the
airport in site then you must go missed. You could cancel IFR or request a contact approach but you can't just decide to "go vfr". You can't cancel unless you meet the VFR cloud requirements. You should be darn sure that you will be able to find the airport because maneuvering at KSUN in murky weather is hazardous. There is never much frequency congestion at KSUN when it is IFR. It is one in and one out with additional arrivals stacked in the hold at HLE. While holding, they are talking to Salt Lake Center. Mike MU-2 wrote in message ... Opinions please: Hailey Idaho, KSUN, daytime, ndb dme approach (circling only minima), map is 5.3 nm back from threshhold, minima are 8000 ft (2681) and 5 miles, with "fly visual to airport" annotation. 1. Since 5.3 nm is just over 6 sm, is this not contrary to the FAR's, in that you can fly visual to the airport, even though at the map you cannot see the airport? 2. What would be the legality of deciding just prior to the map that you've just enough visibility and ceiling for vfr, though well below the 5 sm in the approach visibility minimums, and continuing vfr until the field is in site, and landing? Assume that frequency congestion did not allow you time to cancel ifr. Stan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|