A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old October 28th 06, 08:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

Morgans wrote:
"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote

The hard part would be to come up with a reasonable replacement for the
spars
in the wings. To avoid the big expensive spruce planks, one might have to
consider an engineered product like Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL)...

Have you ever used those? They are HEAVY, with a capital "H".


SNIP


--
Jim in NC


Jenny Craig strikes again :-)

I am still very intriqued by filament winding. Spars would probably be
most obvious use of this technology. Take a look at the pictures on
this page to get an idea why.

http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/sho...11160b889f2560
2fba&t=1774&page=2

Doesn't that kindof suggest the ability to make a whole spar, wing,
fueselage or control surface in one shot? I am presuming scaled
composites uses something similar but bigger. I've seen pictures of the
system NASA uses for booster casings, they stand about 20 ft. tall if
I remember correctly.

I will be checking the local yellow pages to see if there are any
mast-makers where I live. I'd like to take a closing look at a system
like this.


-Matt


Actually, filament winding would be a poor choice for spars, as the
filaments should run primarily parallel to the spar and be concentrated
at the top and bottom. You do need some in the webs, to handle shear
loads, but an "I" section is the most efficient. A tubular spar for a
wing is also a poor choice, as it concentrates a lot of its tensile
strength at its center, where it doesn't get much loading.


Couldn't that be controlled by adjusting the weave? Perhaps weave in
three angles instead of two, with the third being parallel to the
length axis? The form could be semi-rectangular as well, which would
give you your ability to concentrate fibers on the top and bottom.
Obviously you can't escape some wastage, but "perfect" is the enemy of
"good enough".

A mast is a different story, as it is expected to take similar bending
loads in all directions; a spar does not.


Are you quite familiar with filament winding? I've got a lot of
questions if you've got the time.

-Thanks
-Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
compound curves in plywood BA-100 Home Built 58 April 13th 05 05:29 AM
cvjetkovic ca-65 skyfly- plywood spar? patrick mitchel Home Built 3 October 16th 04 05:26 PM
Air Conditioning System for Homebuilts? JPAviation Home Built 18 February 6th 04 03:24 AM
Homebuilts by State Ron Wanttaja Home Built 14 October 15th 03 08:30 PM
Substitute for Mahogany plywood Kelvin & Janice Rempel Home Built 1 September 5th 03 08:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.