![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:48:12 +0000 (UTC), "David Cartwright"
wrote: "Peter Clark" wrote in message news ![]() When breaking off an instrument approach in VMC, once told to change to advisory, maneuver as needed to enter a standard VFR pattern, including breaking off a straight in approach to an in-use runway and join the pattern. But isn't a straight-in approach part of a perfectly valid VFR pattern? Why bother flying around the town when you're already lined up for finals? (applies to Steve's reply as well) The way it was explained to me, if there are already aircraft in the pattern, doing a straight in would likely cut them off, and would increase exposure to a base-to-final/straight-in final midair (I'm assuming this is also attempting to comply with 91.113(g), don't get lower on a straight in just to have right-of-way). Course, if there's nobody discernable visually or via radio already in the pattern when I get there I'd continue the approach straight-in and land, but if I can't ensure that I'd come in behind someone already on downwind, I'd maneuver to get behind them in the sequence. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
joining the traffic pattern quandary | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | January 17th 05 05:07 PM |