![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Personal flying often involves decisions which are made independent of the weather, making the weather a complicating factor rather than a deciding factor. But that's even more true of self-flown business flying. There are lots of pilots who only fly for personal reasons that will only fly when the weather is nice - making weather a deciding factor. Those who fly on business rarely do this. I was including this kind of business flying as "personal flying". Do the statistics separate it out? Yes - and it is MUCH safer. So, anything that rasies the cost of flying, or makes it more difficult to accomplish a mission by flying, or increases the impact of weather on flying, or discourages flying, will have a component that adversely affects safety. I agree. Thus all safety rules are bad - they do all the above. Not quite. All (such)safety rules =contain= a bad component. Some of them contain sufficient good component as to outweigh that. I'm not convinced that this is ever true. There are two things that you have to assume about a safety rule to believe the good component outweighs the bad: (1) A significant number of people will comply with the rule only because it is a rule, and not because it is a good idea. Make it merely advisory, and significant numbers of people will not comply. (2) The benefit from the above is sufficiently great that the negative impact on cost, utility, etc. of flying, and the consequent reduction in proficiency, is offset. This can really only happen if the people writing the rules are a lot smarter and/or more knowledgeable about aviation than the people being forced to comply. I've met a lot of airplane owners, and I've met a lot of FAA employees. I'm pretty confident that the opposite is true. However (my point), some safety rules, though they do contain =some= good component, contain more bad component and are a net bad. I can think of plenty of those. I would be interested in a rule you would consider a net good. Please limit to private aviation only (no commercial ops) since that's clearly where the worst safety problems exist. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
request for fighter pilot statistic | gatt | Piloting | 64 | December 21st 05 10:55 PM |
Very disturbing article about air safety | JJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 22nd 04 08:56 AM |