![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
So I still don't think that government agencies are not required to abide by _all_ the FARs. Government agencies, including the military, are presumably still rerquired to abide by all the FARs that use the unqualified "aircraft" or "person" terminology. The problem here is in the U.S. Constitution, I believe. A/C owned by say Interior cannot be forced to be maintained by rules of the DOT. DOT can't ask Justice, the law firm to both agencies, to litigate against Interior. If Interior said its employee/pilots need not be certificated, then I think FAA can't enforce against the pilot individually. No certificate; no certificate action. If they proposed a civil fine for operating w/o a certificate plus other violations, Interior would step in and defend the employee and their own rule that their pilots need not have certificates. Then no way to force it to court. It ultimately would be the United States of America v. the United States of America. Fred F. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Passing of Richard Miller | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | April 5th 05 01:54 AM |
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:48 PM |
Wife agrees to go flying | Corky Scott | Piloting | 29 | October 2nd 03 06:55 PM |