![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hans wrote:
Hi Udo! A Canadian or US citizen or permanent resident will fly a gilder in a legal fashion only, if the Flarm is removed from the glider. But some glider hirer will allow the removal of the Flarm, because most likely his hull insurance will not pay, as would my hull insurance if I would remove the Flarm from my glider. Furthermore a lot of soaring sites allow take off only with functional Flarm. The big problem is, that a Canadian or US citizen or permanent resident can sign no legal binding document that frees the manufacturer from liability. What liability are we talking about? And how could that liability be any greater than that of any other manufacturer of electronic devices for aircraft? The document will be binding only for him but not for the surviving dependents or for the entities that have to support the surviving dependents. Hans |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cry the beloved continent. | European | Soaring | 0 | January 9th 06 03:36 AM |
Barometer Setting in Europe question... | Piloting | 19 | April 3rd 05 09:43 PM | |
Airmen in Europe may go back to three-month rotation schedules | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 22nd 03 11:47 PM |
Could it happen he The High Cost of Operating in Europe | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 5 | July 14th 03 02:34 AM |